The High Court in London ruled Friday that extremist Islamist cleric
Abu Hamza al-Masri and four other men will be extradited to the United
States to face terrorism charges, bringing to an end a years-long legal
battle.Judge John Thomas said there could be no appeal of the court's decision.The extradition of
al-Masri and the four others -- Khaled al-Fawwaz, Adel Abdul Bary, Babar
Ahmad and Talha Ahsan -- to the United States "may proceed
immediately," he said.
The charges against
al-Masri include conspiracy in connection with a 1998 kidnapping of 16
Westerners in Yemen, and conspiring with others to establish an Islamic
jihad training
camp in rural Oregon in 1999. He could be sentenced to
life in prison if convicted.
The UK Home Office
welcomed the High Court decision. "We are now working to extradite these
men as quickly as possible," it said in a statement.The U.S. Embassy in London said it is "pleased" by the court's ruling.
"All of these defendants
will be guaranteed the same rights provided to American citizens charged
with crimes in the U.S. They will be afforded a full opportunity to
challenge the evidence against them in U.S. courts," an embassy
statement said.
The suspects' lawyers had
sought to persuade Thomas and a second senior judge to stay the
extradition on medical and human rights grounds. It had already been
approved by British courts, the European Court of Human Rights and
Britain's home secretary.
Thomas said the judges
are satisfied that the European court had not fallen into error "and was
justified in drawing the conclusion that it did."
It was "unacceptable" that extradition proceedings should take so long, he said. They should last "months, not years," he said.
The five men had taken every possible effort to prevent their extradition, he added.
The legal process in the case of al-Fawwaz and Bary has lasted 14 years.
In a statement read out
on his behalf outside the court, Ahmad -- who has been detained without
trial since 2004 -- claimed a moral win.
"Today I have lost my
eight-year and two-month battle against extradition. I would like to
thank all those over the years who supported me and my family: lawyers,
politicians, journalists and members of the public from all walks of
life," it said.
"By exposing the fallacy
of the UK's extradition arrangements with the U.S., I leave with my
head held high having won the moral victory."His father, Ashfaq
Ahmad, said the UK police, prosecutors and judiciary had "colluded to
implement a pre-determined decision which was made in Washington."
He added: "We will never
abandon our struggle for justice and the truth will eventually emerge
of what will be forever remembered as a shameful chapter in the history
of Britain."
The ruling follows a three-day last-ditch hearing this week.
Lawyers for al-Masri told the court their client suffers from deteriorating mental health and was unfit to plead.
However, the judges'
ruling dismissed this argument. "There is nothing to suggest it would be
unjust or oppressive to order his extradition," Thomas said.
The cases of Babar Ahmad
and Talha Ahsan are both linked to a website called azzam.com, which
U.S. prosecutors say was run by the two men to support terrorism around
the world.
Meanwhile, Al-Fawwaz and Bary are accused of being al Qaeda associates of Osama bin Laden in London during the 1990s.
Lawyers for al-Fawwaz
presented evidence, including some arising from an interview by British
intelligence officers with an al Qaeda informer, which they say
discredits the case against him.
Presenting medical
reports, lawyers for Bary said he had a deteriorating mental illness,
making him unfit for detention in a high-security Supermax prison, where
he is expected to be held if sent to the United States.
But giving his ruling, Thomas said there was a clear prima facie case against both Bary and al-Fawwaz.
He also dismissed the
medical argument put forward by Bary's lawyer against extradition,
saying: "It is clear to us that there has been no material change in the
psychological condition of Abdul Bary."
Lawyers for Ahmad and
Ahsan presented what they said was fresh evidence to support their calls
for the two men to be charged with similar terrorism-supporting
offenses in Britain, rather than have them face trial in the United
States.
The U.S. and British governments strongly contested the five suspects' submissions.
Lawyers for the British government described the arguments as an abuse of the legal process.
Al-Masri is one of the
highest-profile radical Islamic figures in Britain, where he was already
sentenced to seven years for inciting racial hatred at his north London
mosque and other terrorism-related charges.
Born in Egypt in 1958, he traveled to Britain to study before gaining citizenship through marriage in the 1980s.
A one-time nightclub
bouncer in London's Soho district, al-Masri -- also known as Mustafa
Kamal Mustafa -- has said he lost both hands and one eye while fighting
against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. He often wore a hook in
place of one hand.
In 1997, al-Masri became
the imam of a north London mosque, where his hate-filled speeches
attacking the West began to attract national attention and followers,
including Richard Reid, the so-called "shoe bomber" who attempted to
blow up a Miami-bound passenger airplane three months after the
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Al-Masri has called the
9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center "a towering day in history" and
described bin Laden as "a good guy and a hero."
He also described the
Columbia space shuttle disaster in 2003 as "punishment from Allah"
because the astronauts were Christian, Hindu and Jewish.
Al-Masri faces 11 charges in U.S. courts.
"As in the UK, legal
counsel will be provided at the expense of the U.S. government if the
defendants do not have the resources to pay themselves," a U.S. Embassy
briefing note on the extradition said.
"The U.S.-UK Extradition Treaty also forbids use of the death penalty for anyone extradited from the UK."
Culled:CNN
Edited:LII
No comments:
Post a Comment