One of CNN's resident
experts is producer Mohammed Tawfeeq, who was in Baghdad when President
George W. Bush dodged a flying shoe at news conference in the U.S.
Embassy in December 2008.
Journalist Muntadhar al-Zaidi tossed it because he wanted to "humiliate the tyrant," his brother said yes.
"Yes, I was there," Tawfeeq said. "It was a very big deal in Iraq."
In fact, some Iraqis celebrated that moment, he said.
"Other people were not
happy because
for them they see it -- by end of the day -- like a guest
visiting their country," Tawfeeq said. "Traditionally, it was also
offensive to insult a guest."
The act of throwing a shoe at someone or showing them your sole is "incredibly offensive" in the Middle East, he said.
"The bottom line is a shoe is dirt," he said. "Throwing a shoe on someone means throwing dirt on that person."
Professor Faegheh
Shirazi, with Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Texas, agreed,
saying it is offensive "regardless of the religious practices."
"Throwing a shoe or
hitting someone with a shoe or showing the bottom of your shoe when
sitting with legs up on a chair and facing another person all are
culturally unacceptable and are considered to be a grave insult and
belittling to a person," Shirazi said.
Another offensive aspect is the significance of the shoe being a sign of wealth.
"Most often,
lower-status people and poor men could not wear shoes," Shirazi said.
"The feet came in contact with pollution and the dirt on the road. The
dirt on the feet indicated the lack of social status, the level of
economic class and the level of education and lack of sophistication and
intellect."
Tawfeeq, who
occasionally visits the United States, was surprised to learn shoe
throwing was not considered an offense in North America.
A search of literature reveals references suggesting the power of the shoe is ancient.
For example, in the King
James Version of the Old Testament, Psalm 60:8 says: "Moab is my
washpot; over Edom will I cast out my shoe: Philistia, triumph thou
because of me."
"Perhaps it has to do
with the hierarchy of the body position, that is, the relationship
between the head and the feet, the head being at the top and not
touching the ground and the dirt," Shirazi said. "The head carries a
more prestigious status in comparison to the feet, which in older times
mostly remained bare."
No comments:
Post a Comment