An unexpected Russianproposal for Syria to avert a U.S.
military strike by transferring control of its chemical weapons appeared to be
gaining traction Tuesday, as Syria embraced it, France said it would draft a
U.N. Security Council resolution to put the plan into effect, and China and
Iran voiced support.
French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said bringing the
proposal to the Security Council would enable the world to judge the intentions
of Russia
and China, which until now have blocked efforts to sanction
Syria for any actions during its 21 / 2-year-long civil conflict.
But major questions remain over whether Syria’s longtime
patrons and critics will be able to agree on the specifics of a resolution and
how Syria’s banned
chemical stockpiles could be transferred to international
monitors in the midst of a bloody and protracted civil war that has claimed
more than 100,000 lives.
Russia floated the idea of handing over the weapons Monday,
after a seemingly off-hand remark by U.S. Secretary of State John F. Kerry that
such a move would be the only way for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to avoid
a U.S. military strike.
President Obama has been urging world leaders and U.S.
lawmakers to endorse military action as a way of sending a message of
condemnation and deterrence to Assad, whose government allegedly authorized
nerve gas attacks outside Damascus on Aug. 21 that killed more than 1,400
civilians.
But on Monday evening, after Russia and Syria embraced
Kerry’s weapons-transfer scenario, Obama said that the idea of monitoring and
ultimately destroying Syria’s arsenal “could potentially be a significant
breakthrough.” The Senate postponed a vote scheduled for Wednesday on whether
to back a proposed strike.
“I think you have to take it with a grain of salt, initially,”
Obama said in an interview with NBC that was among several he gave Monday in
pursuit of public support for a military strike. “We’re going to make sure that
we see how serious these proposals are.”
Obama is scheduled to address the nation Tuesday evening at
9 p.m. Eastern time. His speech was originally planned as the capstone of a
newly focused effort to rally a skeptical public and reluctant lawmakers in
favor of a military strike. That approach could change, however, given the new
proposal.
Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moalem told State Duma
Speaker Sergei Naryshkin in Moscow on Tuesday that his country would accept
Russia’s proposal for establishing international control over its chemical
weapons, Interfax reported. Moalem said the Syrian government decided Monday
evening to accept the plan “to stave off American aggression.”
But it was not clear whether the resolution language
proposed on Tuesday by Fabius would be acceptable to Russian officials, who
have voiced doubts about whether the Syrian government was responsible for the
Aug. 21 attacks and who can veto any Security Council resolution.
The resolution will “condemn the massacre of August 21
committed by the Syrian regime,” Fabius told reporters in Paris, and “require
that this regime sheds light without delay on its chemical weapons program,
that they be placed under international control and that they be dismantled.”
No comments:
Post a Comment