The US secretary of state has said that President John Kerry added that he had no expectation that the Syrian leader would comply.
Bashar al-Assad has
one week to hand over his entire stock of chemical weapons to avoid a
military attack. But
Kerry
also said he had no doubt that Assad was responsible for the chemical
weapons attack in east Damascus on 21 August, saying that only three
people are responsible for the chemical weapons inside Syria
– Assad, one of his brothers and a senior general. He said the entire
US intelligence community was united in believing Assad was responsible.
Kerry was speaking on Monday alongside the UK foreign secretary, William Hague,
who was forced to deny that he had been pushed to the sidelines by the
House
of Commons decision 10 days ago to reject the use of UK force in
Syria.
The US Senate is due to vote this week on whether to
approve an attack and Kerry was ambivalent over whether Barack Obama
would use his powers to ignore the legislative chamber, if it were to
reject an attack.
The US state department stressed that Kerry was
making a rhetorical argument about the one-week deadline and
unlikelihood of Assad turning over Syria's chemical weapons stockpile.
In a statement, the department added: "His point was that this brutal
dictator with a history of playing fast and loose with the facts cannot
be trusted to turn over chemical weapons, otherwise he would have done
so long ago. That's why the world faces this moment."
Kerry said
the US had tracked the Syrian chemical weapons stock for many years,
adding that it "was controlled in a very tight manner by the Assad
regime … Bashar al-Assad and his brother Maher al-Assad, and a general
are the three people that have the control over the movement and use of
chemical weapons.
"But under any circumstances, the Assad regime
is the Assad regime, and the regime issues orders, and we have regime
members giving these instructions and engaging in these preparations
with results going directly to President Assad.
"We are aware of that so we have no issue here about responsibility. They have a very threatening level of stocks remaining."
Kerry
said Assad might avoid an attack if he handed every bit of his chemical
weapons stock, but added that the Syrian president was not going to do
that. He warned that if other nations were not prepared to act on the
issue of chemical weapons, "you are giving people complete licence to do
whatever they want and to feel so they can do with impunity".
Kerry
said the Americans were planning an "unbelievably small" attack on
Syria. "We will be able to hold Bashar al-Assad accountable without
engaging in troops on the ground or any other prolonged kind of effort
in a very limited, very targeted, short-term effort that degrades his
capacity to deliver chemical weapons without assuming responsibility for
Syria's civil war. That is exactly what we are talking about doing –
unbelievably small, limited kind of effort."
The secretary of
state repeatedly referred to genocides in eastern Europe and Rwanda in
putting forward his case for taking military action. "We need to hear an
appropriate outcry as we think back on those moments of history when
large numbers of people have been killed because the world was silent,"
he said. "The Holocaust, Rwanda, other moments, are lessons to all of us
today.
"So let me be clear," he continued. "The United States
of America, President Obama, myself, others are in full agreement that
the end of the conflict in Syria requires a political solution."
But
he insisted such a solution was currently impossible if "one party
believes that he can rub out countless numbers of his own citizens with
impunity using chemicals that have been banned for 100 years".
Hague
was forced to emphasise that the UK was engaged in the Syrian crisis
through its call for greater action on humanitarian aid, as well as
support for the Geneva II peace process.
He pointed out that David
Cameron had convened a meeting of countries at the G20 summit in Saint
Petersburg to ramp up the humanitarian effort.
Hague met members
of the Syrian opposition last Friday and described its leaders as
democratic and non-sectarian. On Monday, he avoided questions on why he
was not providing lethal equipment to the Syrian opposition.
He
said it was for the US to decide whether to attack Syria without
congressional endorsement. "These are the two greatest homes of
democracy and we work in slightly different ways and we each have to
respect how each other's democracies work."
Kerry said he did not
know if Obama would release further intelligence proving the culpability
of Assad in the chemical weapons attack, saying the administration had
already released an unprecedented amount of information.
No comments:
Post a Comment